Mark Levin - Behold the Coward & Hypocrite

Comments

[this is good]
Wow!
I don't think I have ever listened to him. I do like Glenn Beck though. That man is hilarious. I used to like Hannity, but then I realized that he didn't have an original thought in his head. Rush is good.
Hannity has the problem of being an ultra-gentleman. His concerts and charity work shows me he has a heart of gold and some great ideas. He does practice what he preaches. He may not be as blunt or in-your-face as the others, but he has his unique positives as well. My only problem is his poor statement of "we pledge allegiance to the United States of France, and to the anointed one for which it stands...etc" I understand him saying it, it's just I think it's poor way of saying what he's thinking. Instead of the "United States of France" how about the "Endentured Socialist States of America?"

But Hannity, the "ultra-gentleman" as you say, promotes the "homosexual lifestyle" on his dating site, Hannidate. Speaking of... how's your "he just had to give blow jobs" brother?

This article is about Mark Levin, or have you not bothered to look?

Nevertheless, have you heard what happened to eHarmony.com? Once again, despite it being a private business geared to a specific audience, the ACLU stuck their noses in and created a new "right" out of thin air for homosexuals (oddly enough there are homosexual only sites though). I don't speak for Mr. Hannity, but I would venture to guess this legal precedent may have something to do with being able to do same sex matches on his site. Besides, there is such a thing as conservative homosexuals. Nobody is perfect.

How is my brother? He visits his kids on occasion. He lost his regular job and is concentrating on his business he runs right now, which is an english school. Things aren't the best, but he's getting by. Once again, he's all distraught over being "dumped" by another boyfriend, and he wonders what's wrong with him. Mostly he whines about himself and getting HIS needs satisfied. Too bad.

Madonna, just because a brother does something stupid, doesn't mean you cease to love him or you ostracize him. He knows how I feel, but that doesn't mean I can't talk to him on the phone (we live far away). The family has said it's piece, but that doesn't mean he's not invited to the "picnics" anymore. Nice try, at your typical liberal attempt at shifting the conversation. Epic fail.

After going back and reviewing my blog posts and reading the comments and replies to them, I must say, a lot of people had coherent responses to my words, some in disagreement most in agreement. All, even the disagreements, had a point and followed an intellectual path. I must congratulate you. Yours is the first nonsensical comment post (and a reply at that) my blogs have ever received.

After reading it three days later, I couldn't help but laugh. I do, however, notice the typical liberal tactic of misdirection; normally used to distract someone from the topic at hand and try to get them to concentrate on something else "controversial" in an attempt to discredit the speaker without addressing what they said initially. It's called the "oh yeah, well what about.." method.

First, I try to figure out how "ultra-gentleman" has anything to do when you alleged Sean Hannity promotes the homosexual lifestyle on his Hannidate site. A completely nonsensical pairing in a single sentence of two totally unrelated topics.

Second, you used another liberal tactic of attacking ones family to distract and discredit. This is the intellectual equivalent of "Yo mama's so fat ..."

All this shows and demonstrates to me is that you cannot make a coherrent statement without distraction, instead of addressing the topic at hand. What's sad is you're not very good at it. Watch some more Michael Moore movies and a few episodes of Bill Maher, and then you might be able to get the hang of it. Better yet, watch some John Stewart (Leibowitz), at least he can do it with humor, which is much more interesting.

Now, to once again address the issue of a member of my family, my brother. Something you clearly misunderstood about my comment to JudgeBob's article was that my displeasure with my brother wasn't so strong with his newly chosen homosexual lifestyle. In fact, my displeasure was him dumping his family for the lifestyle. THAT was selfish. While, certainly, I was saddened by his choice of lifestyle, I was angered and disappointed at his choice to do it even though it meant tossing aside his responsibilties to his children, and yes, even his wife.

I would certainly had a different reaction had he been a man and raised his kids and helped his wife (like he promised) at least until the children had all grown. While the certainly would have been the disappointment knowing he knew better, but there would also have been a respect that he at least thought of his family first.

I've known and worked with many homosexuals in my life. In fact, up until a few months ago, I was raised and lived in Southern California where the lifestyle is accepted by society as "normal", I knew it was wrong, yet I didn't preach to these people, nor treat them any differently than others. I'd go to lunch with them and other friends, tell jokes, etc. In fact, one gay acquaintance thanked me for showing him that everything he'd been told about conservatives and Christians was wrong, and that not all Christians are those idiots with signs saying everyone but them is going to hell. He understood what my beliefs were because he asked me, and he respected me as I showed him respect for his choices in his life. Respecting does not mean agreeing. In fact, he understood and respected WHY I supported California's Proposition 8. Without elaborating, he said "well, when you put it that way, I can understand." He didn't agree with me, but he did understand and respect my point of view.

Despite the propaganda to the contrary, you can consider homosexuality a sin and wrong, but that doesn't mean you are "homophobic". In fact, it's usually the liberals that are "deiophobic" accusing those of religion to be homophobic in an attempt to distract from the topic at hand. It's the usualy reaction to something you don't have a valid intellectual counter-argument for.

So accept this award I bestow upon you Madonna: SuperSparky's most presigous award of "Probus Vinco Turbatio Quod Distraho" Congratulations!
Well, the issue I'm aware of with Beck saying McCain would have been worse than Obama was pretty repugnant. I think Mark served him up pretty well over it. I just don't think Mark respects him enough to mention his name and give him any publicity, but it's clear from the context who he is talking about. And he's not holding back. I think you should back out of it and let them handle it between themselves. From my limited understanding I'll back Mark who is in this for the right reasons, making a difference by getting some truth out there. You can tell that by the fact he's not milking money from his listeners with the subscriptions and you can just download his show as a podcast.

No radio stations here cover Beck, so I'm ignorant on him. I also don't watch TV news much as the format mostly annoys me these days. I've seen a couple youtube clips, kind of struck me as a guy out to make a buck as a conservative version of those comedy channel clowns. Don't jump on me because I didn't mention names, :).
Well, in the context Glenn said that about McCain, it makes sense (I happened to see and hear Glenn say it). Glenn did not say John McCain was a worse human being than Obama, nor did he say that McCain's DIRECT ACTIONS would damage the nation worse than Obama like Obama is doing.

Would Glenn or I eat with John McCain at dinner? Yes. Would we even allow him to babysit? Probably. Would Glenn or I say the same of Obama? No.

Glenn likened John McCain to being "Progressive-light" and Obama a heavy Progressive. It's the small and steady progressive infiltrations in our government and society that got this way. People didn't notice it until they were neck deep in it.

Obama, is so gun-ho progressive, that he is jamming 50 years worth of progressivism down our throats that it is making us gag and cough to the point where lots of people see (finally) what has been happening since Woodrow Wilson and FDR, and how this nation isn't what it was founded to be.

Obama's blatant agenda is actually causing people to wake up and take a stand.

Glenn's point about McCain is that it would have been business as usual with little bits of progressivism and government control here and there (progressive-light he calls it) the same old lulling to sleep they have been doing to the American public for nearly a century.

Does Glenn think John McCain is a hero? You bet yah. Does Glenn think John McCain AS AN INDIVIDUAL PRESIDENT would have been better than Obama? You bet yah. However, I have to agree with Glenn. In the long run, had McCain been President, the long-term and eventual damage to this nation would have been worse, because McCain would have allowed watered down forms of this trash to be signed into law under the guise of "bipartisanship". People wouldn't notice the gradual rise in the bureaucracies and spending that would have resulted in it. I believe, and Glenn believes (as he has stated it) the damage, by the time we noticed it, would have been far worse, and possibly too late to fix.

Because of Obama's blatant and radical agenda and staff, it's easy to see what is happening, like a lighthouse on a clear night.

Things like the tea party movement, etc. I honestly think would never have happened with McCain President.

If I could best analogize the two, then Obama would be a super pump (thousands of gallons per second) with the suction end on a pool of progressivism and fascism and the "out" end aimed at your head, and McCain would be a funnel (with a narrow neck) with progressivism slowly poured at your feet as it has been (with a slight stoppage during Reagan's Presidency).

By the way,I have noticed those YouTube clips conveniently leave out important context building parts so they can be spun any way the poster wants. Want context? The full clip is usually on either of these web sites, with context:

FoxNews' Glenn Beck Section

Glenn Beck's own web site

As to Mark Levin. It's been a while since I wrote this article, nevertheless, I honestly think there is a reason why Glenn is #3 (two below Rush) in radio show ratings and Levin isn't. Mark always gives me the impression of an impatient intellectual snob, and Glenn always says he's just some "schlub" trying to find the answers and the truth. I think Mark is 100% American Patriot and I apply the same to Glenn. I just think Glenn uses humor and CLASS to get his message across. Mark just sounds like a bitter old man. "Get off the phone you big dope!" sounds so much like "Hey Kids! Get off my lawn!" it's almost scary.

I still listen to Mark on occasion. I listen and watch Glenn almost daily. It's amazingly fun.



Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in

SuperSparky

About Me

SuperSparky
United States
The Constitution is the highest law in the USA, not Congress, not the President, not the Supreme Court

Archives